![]() |
|
SUPERMAN II RECONSTRUCTION - SPECULATION FAN REVIEWS PAGE 2
- All new introduction by director Richard Donner - Commentary by director Richard Donner and creative consultant Tom Mankiewicz - New featurette Superman II: Restoring the Vision - Additional scenes - Dolby Digital 5.1 - Subtitles: English, Français & Español (feature film only)
Special Thanks to Aaron Price for the Superman II logo. |
FAN REVIEWS PAGE 2 Selected reviews from the fans. Ollie W: HOW WORKING ON A FAN-CUT COULD LEAD ME TO FALL IN LOVE WITH
Yes I've seen some of the fan cuts and I've worked on one myself but this is now the Superman II for me and I want to tell the whole world about it. I first watched the movie on December 6th and whilst I enjoyed the new Donner scenes I found the editing hindered the overall experience. I probably should've watched it again right away, but I was inspired by some of the creative works being undertaken by the fan-edit community so I decided to have a crack myself. Three week later and I'd put together a rough cut which I then burnt to disk to inspect. The result was less than satisfying. It felt more like a refined version of the RIC rather than a Donner Superman film. So I started over this time with the intent of utilising only the material available on the Donner disk. As my edit got more and more refined I was left with a cut very similar to the one Thau put together, and it got me thinking why don't I just enjoy the movie as it is? Well I watched it twice over the weekend (once on its own the second time with commentary), simply put I had a ball. By erasing the Lester cut from my mind I had a far better experience. I got to say, Jacob you were right, it is fine as it is. Well maybe not fine it still has its flaws, but then so to will the fan-cuts and so to does the theatrical cut. The point is it works. To those of you out there who are still dissatisfied with the film, I implore you to watch it a couple more times and to really give it a chance. If you can't let go of the Lester version you've got no hope. You'll just be left questioning certain music cues, different dialog and performances and ultimately you'll be left dissatisfied. However if you can watch it as a separate film you will appreciate it as a true sequel with the warmth and style of STM. Anyway here's my review; THE OPENING: A shame more money couldn't have been spent on the credit sequence, there's no denying it looks cheap. DAILY PLANET: Can't not mention the detail on the set, the lighting the camera work, is simply beautiful. LEX'S ESCAPE / LEX & EVE AT THE FORTRESS: When viewing the head North stuff Thau's definitely condensed it when compared to the RIC. However as this scene is pretty lengthy I think it would've just dragged on a little too much especially considering the film runs under 2 hours. Thau really shouldn't have shown Marlon in full body let alone in colour. Firstly it looks tacky, but more importantly it weakens the emotional impact Brando makes when he appears in full-figure to restore Superman's powers. The toilet flush is a disappointing distraction, no need for it. Initially I thought the head south scene should've been included but now I'm comfortable that it wasn't. It's a fun little scene and it does address a few holes but it kinda plays out of itself, and I can't help but think had Braid edited the film he would've cut it out anyway. BLANK BULLETS: THE DE-POWERING RE-POWERING THE BATTLE: The battle is much more serious in tone; finally we have those annoying comedy elements removed. Most of it isn't Donner's but I glad he shot all the stuff inside the Daily Planet, it looks great. FORTRESS BATTLE: I'd like to have seen the Artic Patrol scene included. The break-up scenes both in the fortress and back on Lois's balcony are highly emotional. Wonderful performances are given by both stars. THE ENDING: Some have suggested that Lois could've just been left knowing Superman secret. This I can't agree with. All the Superman films have some degree of closure, and the schizophrenic relationships that exist between the three characters only work because Lois doesn't know Clark's secret. It would've been a weak ending which would've left us with even less Donner footage. Cutting that Daily Planet end scene would have been a crime. Yes Rocky shouldn't know what's going on but I don't care. Would you rather the diner scene be cut just to retain consistency, of course not. It may be an obvious flaw but sometimes you've just got to accept things and stop debating over imperfections.
As Donner alludes to in the commentary, there's a lot of footage he would've shot differently. Therefore he tried to speed things up so people couldn't study it to much. PARTING WORDS:
SUPERMAN II: THE RICHARD DONNER CUT REVIEW THE ROAD TO THE RICHARD DONNER CUT: Starting in 1977, director Richard Donner filmed SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE and SUPERMAN II simultaneously. In order to make the deadline for SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE, at some point in production it was decided to postpone filming the remaining scenes needed for SUPERMAN II until after SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE was finished. However, between 50% and 80% of SUPERMAN II was already filmed by Richard Donner before he was replaced/fired by the Salkinds, the producers / financiers of the films. And although all of his scenes had already been filed, Marlon Brandos footage as Supermans father, Jor-El, was to be cut from SUPERMAN II due to his litigation with the Salkinds and Warners. Richard Lester took over as director for SUPERMAN II, continuing filming in July 1979. Lester actually re-shot several scenes already lensed by Donner. Donner has suggested this was a move by the Salkinds to deny Donner a directors credit; other have suggested that in order for Richard Lester to earn a directorial credit on the film, SUPERMAN II had to contain at least 51% of his footage, necessitating rewrites and reshoots. SUPERMAN II, directed by Richard Lester and released in the US in 1981 (overseas in 1980), contained at least 30% (probably more) footage shot by Richard Donner. Although few people knew it at the time, the released version of SUPERMAN II was drastically different than what Donner originally intended. In fact, it was a completely different film than much of what had originally been filmed for SUPERMAN II. Nevertheless, SUPERMAN II was a box office hit, a critical success, an instant classic and a cherished memory for my generation and the next. I loved the film; have seen it dozens (if not over 100) times and it will always hold a very special place in my heart. But for almost a decade, as the Internet and Web grew, Superman fans were lobbying to see a Richard Donner Cut of S2; including ALL of the footage he (not Lester) shot. Specifically, they wanted to see Donners original footage of Marlon Brando as Jor-El, as well as the different scenes that had been replaced / re-shot by Lester. They wanted to see Donners vision, Donners intended companion piece to SUPERMAN: THE MOVIE (STM). In 2006, that campaign paid off as Warner Brothers authorized the cut. Over nine months, editor Michael Thau located, restored, cleaned up and assembled the Donner S2 footage six tons of it --- into a very different version of SUPERMAN II. Using the 1977 SUPERMAN II script penned by Donner and creative consultant Tom Mankiewicz (who, uncredited, also penned the screenplay for STM), Thau re-edited the film, and added several newly-filmed shots with CGI enhancements. Thau did a commendable job creating a new film version of S2 as close to Donners original vision as possible some 25 years later. The film still included Lester footage, but had a decidedly different feeling and was very much a new film, much more in tone with the first Superman film, much more of a true part two to the original film. Over 50% of the RDC was footage never before seen. Part of my difficulty with reviewing the Richard Donner Cut of SUPERMAN II is that I know the original Lester-directed S2 so well (OK, I can quote the entire movie) that comparison is inevitable and unavoidable, and in some cases I balk when I see how different some scenes are. Some scenes feel wrong only because I am used to seeing them presented in the Lester S2 way. I had that knee-jerk reaction several times hey, thats not the next scene! Wheres the Eiffel Towel sequence? Wheres the jump into Niagaras Great Gorge? Wheres, General, would you care to step outside? Getting past that, the RDC is a very good but not great film. Theres a lot to like, theres a lot to love, but there are also some parts to dislike and some questionable choices. After 25 years, its unfair to say which film is better because weve known the Lester cut of S2 since 1981, and it was professionally polished, scored and finished, whereas the RDC is still, in some ways, a fan edit, complete with questionable editing choices in places, pacing issues, and poor music choices in other scenes. Despite being a finished product, there is a somewhat unfinished and rushed quality to it. And it can certainly be argued that most of the flaws in the RDC can be attributed to the fact that it wasnt finished in the first place. All that said, S2: The Richard Donner Cut is a treasure and Michael Thau has pulled the proverbial rabbit out of his hat and given Superman fans a true Christmas present. Considering the age (and disorganization) of the original footage, that Thau could produce a coherent, nearly complete Donner cut is a hell of an achievement that should not be understated. On the whole, his effort paid off handsomely. And he clearly put a lot of thought (and dare I say, love) into his efforts. There is so much about the RDC that is far superior to the Lester version of S2 -- the interaction between Margot Kiddor and Christopher Reeve seems so much more natural and fun, and anything with Brando as Jor-El is better than what Lester re-shot. The fact that these Brando scenes were ever cut is a crime. Brando makes this movie, and among other things, the inclusion of the Brando footage gives real weight and emotion to certain key scenes, and even finally answers exactly how Superman gets his powers back at the Fortress of Solitude. Yes, the RDC is a mixed bag, and as one reviewer said, It is the ultimate deleted scene. But its much more than that. Its the answer to a wish, a look into what could have been, and like most wishes, both good things and not so good things occur when a wish is granted. On that note, lets discuss specifics. THE GOOD (AND THE GREAT): The film is dedicated in loving memory of Christopher Reeve. In the audio commentary, Donner and creative consultant Tom Mankiewicz speak so fondly of Reeve. Very appropriate, very touching. I thought Donners thank you video to the fans at the top of the film was very classy. After the credits, the film opens with the New York skyline and a new image of the World Trade Center. Its a little jarring to see the WTC in a new film post September 11, but the twin towers construction was completed in 1973, just four years before Superman was filmed. No effort was made to remove the WTC from the film, and I am grateful for that. Whether its the Lester cut or Donner cut, visually SUPERMAN II is clearly a period piece set in the late 1970s and to remove the iconic WTC would be wrong. As the villains break free from the Phantom Zone; Zod shouts, Freeeeeeeee! and the credits roll. Powerful! Scary! Throughout the entire RDC, the villains are much more serious, much more menacing. There is real danger here. All of the Lester slapstick and nonsense has been removed. The cute villain moments are gone. Im amazed how such subtle editing changed the Zoners from campy to deadly. In a many of the scenes we have previously viewed, Thau uses different angles of the same take. Nice touch and adds to the new film feeling. The entire first opening at the Daily Planet in which Lois sees Clarks resemblance to Superman fantastic. Reeve and Kidder look like they had so much fun filming this sceneits playful, immediately shows Lois Lane is nobodys fool, and demonstrates how well Reeve played Clark Kent. Donners direction really shows here. The additional banter between Lex and Eve is hilarious. Lexs comment that you never use the words Lex and Wrong in the same sentence is great. Some of their scenes go on a little too long, but usually theyre worth it. Every scene with Brando as Jor-El is better than the Lester scene where he was replaced, although Susannah York DID do a great job in the Lester version of S2. Having Brando back as Jor-El adds such strong (and needed) continuity to the first film. Even though its two different screen tests and Chris Reeve is probably 20 pounds lighter and made up differently, the merged scene in which Lois fires the gun at Clark, who is forced to reveal his true identity, is excellent. After Clark removes his glasses and admonishes Lois that had she been wrong, Clark Kent would be dead, Lois deadpans, With a blank? and then she smiles. Gotcha. Brilliant writing and execution, and far more emotive than Clark tripping over a pink bear. (Although the similar revelation scene in the Richard Lester version is some of Christopher Reeves finest acting. His secret exposed, he turns his back, takes off his glasses, and Clark Kent is simply gone. I miss that). When the villains arrive in Midwestern America, the removal of the lame humor and sight gags is very welcome, improves the movie dramatically, and gives the villains a FAR more menacing quality. The exchange where Jor-El warns Superman of the dangers of falling in love is powerful. This scenes exclusion in the original S2 is inexcusable and wrong. Brando is brilliant here. He is PLEADING with his son not to give up his powers. Think, Kal-El! I beg you! Think! And when Jor-El ask him, Is this how you repay their gratitude? By abandoning the weak, the defenseless, the needy - for the sake of your selfish pursuits? I loved Supermans incredulous, Selfish, after all Ive done for them? At least they have a chance for happiness! I only ask the same, nothing more. is excellent. And theres Lois, after making love to Superman, wearing only Supermans shirt and socks, watching. As Supermans powers are destroyed, Jor-El just stares at her hatefully and she backs up, terrified. Love it. Great addition: General Zod smiling as he shoots people with the machine gun. Really shows how evil he is. Now we come to the money sceneA powerless and bruised Superman arrives at the Fortress of Solitude. (Only gripeLesters choice to darken the fortress a deep, gloomy green is much more effective than Donners choice to keep the Fortress all lit up. In the Lester version, the fortress is dark green, cold and dead. Visually it made more sense.) That quibble aside, this is THE scene we have waited to see, and it was SO worth the wait. Jor-El appears, speaks to Superman, and dies in order to restore his sons powers. Superman: Father... I failed, I failed you, I failed myself and all humanity. I traded my birthright for a life of submission in a world that is now ruled by your enemies. Theres no one left to help them now, the people of the world, not since I FATHER! The Green crystal glows He picks it up, inserts it into the control panel Hes shivering Jor-El: Listen carefully, my son, for we shall never speak again. If you hear me now, then you have made use of the only means left to you - the crystal source through which our communication was begun. The circle is now complete. You have made a dreadful mistake, Kal-El. You have abandoned the world for the sake of private ambition. You did this of your own free will, and in spite of all I could say to dissuade you. Now you have returned here to me for one last chance to redeem yourself. This too - finally - I have anticipated, my son. (pause) Look at me, Kal-El... Once before, when you were small, I died while giving you a chance for life. And now, even though it will exhaust the final energy left within me... Look at me, Kal-El!... The Kryptonian prophecy will be at last fulfilled. The son becomes the father - the father becomes the son. Goodbye forever, Kal-El. Remember me, my son... And Jor-El appears in corporeal form and lays his hand on Supermans shoulder, as Superman shudders and white light engulfs him. IN-CRED-IBLE. This is the CORE of the father-son relationship theme of both films. The acting is compelling, poetic, and strong. HOW COULD THEY CUT THIS SCENE IN THE LESTER VERSION? Back in Metropolis The battle has started! Great moment: Jimmy re-entering the office with Perrys coffee and Lex steals it out of his hand. Jimmy argues that the coffee was the Chiefs and Lex counters calmly that, The Chiefs got it. I loved the new edits - -during the battle over Metropolis, the focus in on whats going on at the Daily Planet, especially with Jimmy, Lois and Perrynot on stupid sight gags and goofy slapstick humor, or people we dont care about (like Luanne). The battle over Metropolis, with a few exceptions, is pretty much the same, mostly Richard Lester footage and very good. Glad to see the slapstick (such as the guy on the phone continuing the conversation after his phone booth is knocked over and blown away) have been removed. This Lester-filmed battle was always VERY good, and Donners inclusions of the few battle shots he filmed (such as Superman hitting and destroying the Statues of Libertys torch) is very cool. The final confrontation at the Fortress is far better than the Lester version. No silly ray-beam or invisible powers, no ripping the S-shield into a piece of cellophane. We just have Zod tell Superman, very matter-of-factly: Your father once condemned us to eternal living death. Your fate shall be the same. You will live, Kal-El. Forever - as my slave. If not, then others will pay for your stubborn attitude. Innocent people, millions of them if necessary --- Beginning with her. and he nods to Lois. And in this edit of the film, thats all it takes, Given everything weve seen, we KNOW Zod will literally destroy the world to get his way. Hes THAT dangerous. Impressive. After the final battle, Superman destroys the fortress and he and Lois end their relationship: SUPERMAN: Look, Lois, I... LOIS: (brave smile) Hey. No... regrets, you know? I mean I did it, didnt I? I got the man I love to love me? SUPERMAN: (Sincerely) Oh, yeah. LOIS: So okay, then. So they need you too. Id be buying my personal little rainbow at the cost of all those people who say, Help, come quick ... you think I dont understand that? Its the old eternal triangle, right? Except in my case Ive got all of humanity in the next bedroom. SUPERMAN: Well see each other. All the time, like before. But it cant be like... LOIS kisses him passionately. He responds in spite of himself. They break. She looks up at him, trembling. LOIS: Just dont forget, thats all. Poetic, beautifully written and acted. Powerful. Poignant. Now we move on to the NOT SO GOOD: Many of my complaints about the RDC have already echoed by reviewers nationwide. The recap of the events in STM is just too longwell over five minutes. Lesters recap in S2 with the credits interweaved with the relevant events of the first movie worked much better even though it ran in about the same time. Bathroom humor. Why? Why in the world restore the god-awful bathroom humor? In prison, Slasher Folgelstein is a bed-wetter. Did you go pssht? Why didnt you go before we left? And the absolute worst a toilet flushing sound in the fortress of solitude. Its beyond juvenile its painful. The Music Thau elected to reuse the John Williams score from the first film rather than the Ken Thorne composition of the Williams music from S2. The result is a decidedly mixed bag. The music just feels wrong in some places, or the wrong piece of music was chosen in many places. Since all the music is reused and wasnt written with S2 in mind, it never quite dovetails and is actually distracting in some places. Luthors escape from Prison is waaaaayyyyyy too long. Editing / pacing: Maybe its just that I know the Lester version of S2 too well, but some of the editing is just not too good. The smash cut to Niagara Falls is jarring, and in some cases the editing is a little distracting. The pacing is a little slow, and in this new film, Superman (in costume) doesnt appear in new footage until 40 minutes into the film, unlike the Lester version of S2 where Kent switches to Superman the first three minutes of the film. The courtship dinner at the fortress is cut before Lois says, Im going to change into something more comfortable and feels rushed. There are two instances where Supermans S is clearly backwards. Sorry, but thats just sloppy. Biggest gripe of allSuperman turns the world around to reverse time AGAIN? I understand that this was the original ending of S2, and at some point the decision was made to move this effect to the first film. In the Lester version of S2, Kent gives Lois the much-derided memory erasing kiss but everyone else remembers the attack of the Phantom Zone villains. In this movie, Superman reverses time to the point where the Donner Cut of the movie never even happens. I understand Donner would have come up with a new ending for SUPERMAN II had he been allowed to continue, but the time-reversal thing in two movies feels worse than a cheat. On that note, as many reviewers have said, if Superman has reversed time, why does everyone at the diner recognize him at the end of the film? Sure, it brings emotional closure to have Kent give Rocky the bully a taste of his own medicine, but in this new timeline the two have never met. Finally, the new wrap-up at the Daily Planet is very sweet, really showing the fondness Lois has for Clark, and I liked his offer to pay for the pizza. Just a sweet scene. However HOW I WOULD HAVE ENDED THE DONNER CUT: REMOVE THE TURN-BACK-TIME GIMMICK COMPLETELY. After the Fortress battle The Phantom Zone villains and Luthor are taken away by the Artic police. Why relegate this to the Deleted Scenes section? Superman destroys the fortress, and Lois and Superman end their relationship in the arctic. After Lois and Superman speak on her balcony, he flies off and DOES NOT TURN TIME BACKWARD. Since Lois has clearly accepted the reality of the situation, there is no need to make her forget anything. Theyre both adults. She understands. It would play so much better. Lois begins typing Superman saves the world Scrap the new Daily Planet scene. Since Superman didnt turn back time it would no longer make sense and isnt necessary to further the plot. Then, Kent returns to the diner and gets his revenge on Rocky. Superman flies the flag back to the White House (Lester footage but very symbolic and powerful) Superman flies into space / end credits. For me, it would just work better. Forget continuity (Lois knowing the secret). Superman III and SUPERMAN IV: THE QUEST FOR PEACE are forgettable and SUPERMAN RETURNS is a vague sequel anyway. SUMMARY It would be unfair to take away anything from Richard Lester for his version of S2. While I dont agree with some of his choices and re-shoots, despise the slapstick humor (and SUPERMAN III Lesters baby start to finish -- was horrible) Lester arguably did his best with what he had to work with in an awkward situation back in 1979, and many of his choices for his S2 were very good and overall, his version of S2 works holds up pretty well even after all these years. I still love it; its still a classic. The revelation to Lois, the powerless Superman returning to the dark, empty fortress, General, would you care to step outside? the Niagara Falls rescue, the Great Gorge jump, the majority of the battle over Metropolis are all Lester footage and very well done. I miss the entire Paris scene at the Eiffel Tower. I miss Kent running into the alley at the top of the film, ripping open his shirt to reveal the S and blurring at super-speed into Superman. Its a great effect, iconic. A few minutes into the Lester film, Superman is flying to the rescue. That moment ranks as one of my favorites in the entire series. In the Donner cut, we never see Kent change to Superman. And so I would be remiss if I did not say, thank you Richard Lester, for your Superman II. I still love it, warts and all. Two visions of the same filmboth with great strengths and certain weaknesses and distractions. So much of the RDC is brilliant and one can really see how this true companion piece to STM would have unfolded. Had Donner been allowed to complete his version of S2 back in 1979, the issues with music and pacing and editing wouldnt exist. So while this review mentions the editing/pacing/music issues with this cut, it is certainly understood they would have been corrected in a perfect world. No matter what, Michael Thau has done a terrific job and made our dream come true. Many thanks to him, as well as Warner Brothers, for making it possible to see Richard Donners original vision of S2. Thank you to all the fans who lobbied for this version of the film. And to Richard Donner, there are no words to thank you for all you have
done to define Superman for generations to come. Thank you for your dedication,
determination, and your vision. And thank you to everyone (especially
Michael Thau) responsible for bring this restored vision of S2 to life.
It was well worth the wait.
|